Unit II: War, Journey, and Ethics

Masculinity in the Face of Conflict

It was almost entirely out of place in this unit that of all the things that could have stuck out to me when reading tales of war and violence was a characters feelings. They really are important, I promise you. Between the homosexual undertones in the Epic of Gilgamesh and the quiet moment Hector has before the events of the Iliad, it’s astounding to me, as a reader, how emotional these men get in cultures where ideas masculinity didn’t involve much feeling.

Starting with Hector and his addition in the Iliad, the reader shares a gentle moment with the solider in the safety of his home. There he says goodbye to his wife and infant in a scene so gut wretchedly real that the reader is struck with the image of a father that will not return after he steps foot into the streets of Troy. The baby begins to cry when they see their father wearing his helmet, when they see a face they cannot recognize under a mask of metal. But once Hector takes it off does the baby become calm once more and the couple share a laugh. We can not only feel Hector’s reluctance to leave, forever, but his made up mind, his duty that he must go. That if he doesn’t, his wife and child will face the same fate as him. It’s soft and somber, and we are suddenly aware that every solider cut down in the Iliad are not just war machines but people. Homes and families are often forgotten in the face of violence so explicitly depicted in a work such as the Iliad, but what it does different is stretching that detail in battle to every corner of empty homes or the tear streaked across a family members face when they see their, son, husband, partner, dragged through the streets of their city, bloody and broken.

52977e62d66e7 (2)

On the other end of the spectrum, in the Epic of Gilgamesh we see a relationship bloom in the light of terrible times that most would label “bromance” but not on this blog, not today, not ever.

Enkidu and Gilgamesh, two of the same and yet there’s just something more. From enemies to friends to partners, we see a relationship between two men that we would never see in modern media without ridicule from every corner of every conservative home. Not to point fingers but, the obvious has now been thoroughly stated. The two bond so much in the time we see them shift gears. Enkidu, who was made to essentially destroy Gilgamesh, not only learns from the other man but teaches him as well. And then we experience such a suffocating level of devastation on Gilgamesh’s part when Enkidu passes. Not in battle but in sickness. He watches Enkidu suffer and lose a little more life everyday. 2 parts God, 1 part Man. 2 parts Beast, 1 part Man. The two were made for each other, they understood each other like no one else did and for the reality of death to strike down not both but one of them is chilling. Men that could not be scratched by the Bull of Heaven and openly challenging the Gods, well, to be taken down by something so human is poetic. Just as their relationship was. Everything about their dynamic is suddenly fragile. Every moment they spent with one another just a memory now, no journey to continue together. Gilgamesh not only mourns but becomes so utterly lost. It’s painful. He becomes not himself, like he could never return to being himself after his Enkidu’s death.

It was interesting to see the men depicted in these stories as strong, independent, brave and trusted, then succumbing to such powerful emotional circumstances. Often, modern masculinity will gloss over the topic of emotion if it has anything to do with sadness, fear, or even happiness in some cases. Society has created this box men are raised in from day one to, “conceal, don’t feel” and they are unable to express certain emotions without ridicule from others. Men are not allowed to cry, be scared, shed a a goddamn tear when their happy, and for what? An image constructed years ago that masculinity is none of these things? I think not. If a man going to war to inevitably die in battle can cry with his wife and kiss his child goodbye is not masculine enough, then you don’t know the meaning of the word. If a man can mourn his friend with tears and lingering kiss on the forehead of his dead body is not masculine enough, then you don’t know the meaning of the word. If men cannot feel anything but anger and pride then your idea of masculinity is lacking everything that makes anyone human.

3 thoughts on “Unit II: War, Journey, and Ethics”

  1. Hi Izzi,
    I love this topic about the emotion intertwined in times of war and battle. It is such a thoughtful topic that I feel has not gotten enough recognition and such a unique way to look at these stories of battle. Hector and his date with destiny and death is definitely a heavy, hard moment in The Illiad. It does make the audience take a second look at the war in general and see that humans are fighting the war and that the casualties of war are not just numbers but people with personalities, lives, families, and values.
    Seeing Gilgamesh and Enkidu’s relationship transform is so beautiful. They start the story both being in their own sort of group of people; Enkidu with his animal pack and Gilgamesh with his loyal subjects that he rules over. It seems that there are no decisnerbale faces or heard voices in these crowds and both men become such emotional, real characters once they befriend one another. The way that Gilgamesh mourns Enkidu is completely heart wrenching, the perfect depiction of being lost once losing a very close person in life.
    These stories that humanize men and show the real emotions that men are forced to hide in our modern society in fear of being ridiculed are both truly beautiful and well expressed. Men should feel free to show emotion in their day to day lives. It really makes you take a second look and ask: Why are we teaching young boys who grow to be men to hide their feelings?
    A truly wonderful observation! I always enjoy reading your thoughts. – Marissa

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Hi Izzy,
    It is pretty interesting that the stories in this unit do focus on the feelings of men considered to be very masculine heroes, and the fact that feelings and masculinity in the current era are barely begging to be associated with one another once again. In ancient cultures feelings were not seen as something that is uniquely feminine, and even in recent but older eras, such as the time of Shakespeare, there isn’t a female monopoly on emotions like there has been in the past 2 or 3 centuries. I don’t know why masculinity has been associated with stoicism and even indifference in the recent era. I think it’s funny how you mentioned the homosexual undertones of The Epic of Gilgamesh, because homosexuality is also something that is not really considered masculine today, but in some ancient societies this was actually the complete opposite. In ancient Greece homosexuality was seen as the highest form of relationship one could enter into. In come versions of the Iliad Patroclus is actually Achilles lover not just his friend, which would make sense why he got so mad when he was killed. Achilles is like one of the most masculine figures in ancient Greece. I have two gay friends that both played football in high school, and are about 200 pounds of muscle. They are both definitely really masculine and really gay, so it makes one wonder how emotions and sexuality came to be considered either feminine or masculine traits when it seems like they have nothing to do with how “manly” or “womanly” a person is.
    Great post, I look forward to reading more from you.
    -Marc

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Hi Izzy,
    I really enjoyed that you pointed out the idea of masculinity and compared it todays idea of masculinity. It is amazing to me that these stories of what are thought of as epic heroes and the epitome of the male image are depicted so vulnerable. Achilles, though he is depicted as a straight manly man in modern adaptations of his story *cough* the Brad Pitt version *cough* he was actually thought of to be the lover of Patroclus. Though he could be very fierce, cruel and dominating to everyone else in the world, he was usually depicted as being very tender to only Patroclus and he was still considered to be masculine. The version of masculinity that we see in todays society has been created by fear of femininity and censorship of stories like these. Versions of these stories pushed out to us today make Patroclus and Achilles cousins and if Achilles or Hector show any kind of emotion it is very brief and is usually followed up by warfare to show how big man tough they are. It is interesting to see that in ancient cultures and texts, showing emotion was not considered to be feminine, but considered to be a normal part of being human; but it also shows how horribly age old ideas can be manipulated and misinterpreted to brainwash future societies into a way of thinking.
    As always, loved hearing your thoughts on the readings and look forward to reading more.
    Bri

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a comment